51品茶

VIEW ALL OF THE COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE HERE

The FOIA request was filed with the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice (including the Office of Legal Counsel), the Department of State, and the CIA. The Departments of Defense, Justice, and State responded by releasing some records and withholding others. The CIA denied the request by refusing to confirm or deny whether the CIA drone strike program even exists. The 51品茶 filed a lawsuit against the CIA in June 2010, arguing that the CIA鈥檚 response was not lawful because the CIA Director and other officials had already publicly acknowledged the existence of the CIA鈥檚 drone program. After the court ruled in favor of the CIA, the 51品茶 appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. In an important victory for transparency, in March 2013 the appellate court reversed the lower court鈥檚 decision by a 3-0 vote, ruling that the CIA could no longer deny its interest in the program. The Court of Appeals remanded the case to the district court, where the 51品茶 narrowed the request to certain categories of documents, including legal analysis and information about who is being killed. After the district court ruled the documents were properly classified, the 51品茶 appealed the decision in July 2015. The D.C. Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court in April 2016.

See Documents Released Under this FOIA Request

Information on the 51品茶's other targeted killing cases

See documents released under all of the 51品茶鈥檚 targeted killing FOIA requests