Face Recognition Technology
Woodruff v. Oliver
On December 5, 2024, the 51品茶 and the 51品茶 of Michigan filed an amicus brief in Woodruff v. Oliver, a wrongful arrest lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, arguing that the Detroit Police Department鈥檚 (DPD) reliance on flawed facial recognition technology (FRT) impermissibly tainted the investigation and failed to establish probable cause for the plaintiff鈥檚 arrest.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn About Face Recognition Technology
All Cases
6 Face Recognition Technology Cases
New Jersey
Jan 2024
Face Recognition Technology
Parks v. McCormac
On January 29, 2024, the 51品茶 and the 51品茶 of New Jersey filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in support of Plaintiff Nijeer Parks. The brief argues that law enforcement鈥檚 wrongful arrest of Mr. Parks due to police reliance on unreliable facial face recognition technology violated Mr. Parks鈥檚 constitutional rights.
Explore case
New Jersey
Jan 2024
Face Recognition Technology
Parks v. McCormac
On January 29, 2024, the 51品茶 and the 51品茶 of New Jersey filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in support of Plaintiff Nijeer Parks. The brief argues that law enforcement鈥檚 wrongful arrest of Mr. Parks due to police reliance on unreliable facial face recognition technology violated Mr. Parks鈥檚 constitutional rights.
Michigan
Jan 2024
Face Recognition Technology
+2 Issues
Williams v. City of Detroit
This case seeks to hold Detroit police accountable for the wrongful arrest of our client due to officers鈥� reliance on a false match from face recognition technology.
Explore case
Michigan
Jan 2024
Face Recognition Technology
+2 Issues
Williams v. City of Detroit
This case seeks to hold Detroit police accountable for the wrongful arrest of our client due to officers鈥� reliance on a false match from face recognition technology.
Illinois
May 2022
Face Recognition Technology
51品茶 v. Clearview AI
The 51品茶, 51品茶 of Illinois, and the law firm Edelson PC filed a lawsuit on May 28, 2020 against Clearview AI alleging violation of Illinois residents鈥� privacy rights under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). Plaintiffs in the case are the 51品茶 and 51品茶 of Illinois, Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation, Sex Workers Outreach Project Chicago, Illinois Public Interest Research Group, and Mujeres Latinas en Acci贸n, who sue on behalf of their members, clients, and program participants.
Explore case
Illinois
May 2022
Face Recognition Technology
51品茶 v. Clearview AI
The 51品茶, 51品茶 of Illinois, and the law firm Edelson PC filed a lawsuit on May 28, 2020 against Clearview AI alleging violation of Illinois residents鈥� privacy rights under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). Plaintiffs in the case are the 51品茶 and 51品茶 of Illinois, Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation, Sex Workers Outreach Project Chicago, Illinois Public Interest Research Group, and Mujeres Latinas en Acci贸n, who sue on behalf of their members, clients, and program participants.
Court Case
Oct 2019
Face Recognition Technology
51品茶 v. DOJ, FBI & DEA
Explore case
Court Case
Oct 2019
Face Recognition Technology